Some Historical Considerations

Dear Bob,

In thinking about how to respond to your very engaging description of the spiritual life of Latter Day Saints, I’m reminded of a two-page hand-out that I developed for use in my teaching of Church History at St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Seminary.  And with this, the grievously vexing, impossible-to-ignore question comes rushing back: If all the various Christian groups today are following Jesus in often very similar ways (as I think this Respectful Conversation is bearing out), why are these groups splintered into thousands of different denominations? – such that they offer to our very suffering surrounding society a very sad picture of fracture and disunity, rather than of vibrant unity in Christ, their common Lord.

This hand-out took shape as a direct response to my reading about the agonizing question that haunted and tormented young Joseph Smith as a 15-year old young man living in upstate New York in 1820: Which Christian denomination is the true one?—and his subsequent conviction that none of them was the true one, so he felt compelled to start a new one.

I’ve reread, Bob, our exchanges in this Respectful Conversation back in August and early September, and once again I’m moved by the openness towards and appreciation for Orthodoxy that you expressed then.  Please forgive me for not pursuing further discussion with you back then.

I’m thinking now it might be helpful to add—in the spirit of further honest, open, and respectful sharing of information and insights—some historical background to what I originally wrote in August about how Orthodox Christians follow Jesus.

With that in mind, may I humbly offer this hand-out for your consideration, for I believe it conveys “in a nutshell” what we Orthodox Christians believe is Christ’s answer to the multiplicity of divisions in Western Christianity.  I hope it will help you to better understand the basic historical reasons why the Orthodox Church considers herself, with humbled awe and wonder at our Lord’s faithful guidance and protection through history, to be the preserver of the fullness of the Christian Faith, in spite of the countless failings and persistent sinfulness of her members—and so making clear that this assertion is not made out of arrogance, or pride, or hubris, or willfulness, or fantasy, but simply from our understanding of the facts of history.

So here is the hand-out:

“All the Protestant denominations have arisen because their founders – and their subsequent followers – became convinced that every expression of Christianity as they knew it was grievously faulty, beyond hope of repair.  Each founder became convinced that the only choice, if one were to be a true Christian, was to begin a new form of Christianity – to start all over again.

“For example, the Protestant Reformation as a whole emerged in response to the perceived hopeless corruption and apostasy of the Roman Catholic Church.  Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon Church, received his first “heavenly visitation” specifically in response to his anguished prayers about the confused state of Christianity in his day (early 19th century America), with its welter of competing, squabbling denominations (his own account is given in Edwin S. Gaustad and Mark A. Noll, eds, A Documentary History of Religion in America, vol. 1, pp. 338-341 [2003 edition]).  And Charles Taze Russell, founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses in the 1870s, was “a sworn adversary of historic Christianity,” according to Walter Martin (Kingdom of the Cults, p. 49 [1985 edition]).

“We as Orthodox Christians emphasize that the Christianity which the founders of all these movements rejected was indeed not true Christianity.  They were only familiar with various Western distortions of the True Faith, so to a great extent we can agree with them in their rejection of all the various forms of Christianity which they knew about.  But was it then correct for these founders of new forms of Christianity to assume that the fullness of Christian Truth and practice had been lost from the earth for so many centuries?

“Christ Himself promised about His Church, “I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18).  He also declared, “When He, the Spirit of truth, has come [at Pentecost], He will guide you into all truth” (John 16:13).  So to believe that Christ’s Church failed to preserve the truth which He gave to His Apostles is to believe that He failed to keep His promises.  This is impossible, for He is “the Way, the Truth, and the Life” (John 14:6; my emphasis).

“Besides, the New Testament calls the Church the Body of Christ: “Christ is the Head of the Church, and He is the Savior of the body” (Eph. 5:23; also Col. 1:18, 1 Cor. 6:15, Eph. 1:22-23; Rom. 12:5).  Surely Christ the Lord is able to guide and keep His own Body, the Church, in the fullness of the Truth!  Similarly, the Scriptures say that the Church is the Bride of Christ, with Her members “married” to Him (Rom. 7:4; also Matt. 9:15, 2 Cor. 11:2, Is. 62:5, Hos. 2:19-20).  Surely the Lord of Glory has always been able – and is still able – to keep His beloved Bride from departing from the Truth, even in spite of all the sinfulness of Her individual members!

“The Apostle Paul states explicitly that the Church, as a visible, tangible, and identifiable place, is “the pillar and ground of the truth”: “I write so that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15).  Paul also tells us the specific means whereby this Truth of the Gospel, through the continual empowerment and guidance of Christ and the Holy Spirit, would be preserved from generation to generation down through history: “And the things that you have heard from me among many witnesses, commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2 Tim. 2:2).

“Now we can proceed to look at the history of the Church.  What really happened after the Book of Acts, and after the last Apostle died?  Many first-hand sources have been preserved which enable us to follow what happened through the centuries in the Church doctrinally, liturgically, organizationally, and spiritually.  If we are open to what these sources say, we will be instructed and guided by the Apostolic Fathers (beginning with St. Clement of Rome’s letter to the Corinthian Church, written in 96 A.D.), the great Apologists for the Faith in the second century, the Lives of the Martyrs, the Seven Ecumenical Councils, and the Lives and writings of the Church Fathers – the great ecclesiastical leaders and monastic teachers of the Church.

“And we will see how the Church in the western part of the Roman Empire gradually—and often not without great resistance—became subjected to the Roman bishop, in violation of the original equality of all the bishops (as strongly affirmed at the first four Ecumenical Councils); and how this part of Christianity gradually departed from the rest of the Church doctrinally, liturgically, organizationally, and spiritually.  This gradual divergence led to the Great Schism of 1054, when one portion of Christianity, the Church in the West under Rome, split off from all the rest of the Church – the Church in the East, which continued to be led by the great ancient Patriarchates of Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch, and Alexandria, and which expanded greatly, beginning in the 9th century, into Eastern Europe and Russia, and from there eventually across all of Asia and into Alaska.

“As we continue the story, we will be able to see clearly that while the Eastern Church – now coming to be known as the Eastern Orthodox Church – continued to maintain the same doctrines, liturgical practices, hierarchical organization, and spiritual ethos of the Early Church, the Roman Church became even more divergent in all these areas, until the Protestant Reformers felt that that church had radically betrayed the Truth of the Gospel, and that therefore they needed to break away to start their own churches.  But tragically, this quite quickly led to the formation of scores, then hundreds, and later thousands, of denominations and cults – a process that continues to this day.

“And all these denominations and cults remain in disagreement with one another in various ways, even though virtually all of them claim to follow the same Scriptures and to be led by the same Holy Spirit.  But without the remarkably consistent guidance of the Holy Tradition of the True Church, within which the true interpretation of the Holy Scriptures is found, manifold incorrect interpretations of the Scriptures are inevitable.

“By an objective, open-minded and open-hearted comparison of the doctrines, liturgical practices, hierarchical organization, and spiritual ethos of the Early Church (as they had taken pretty much definitive shape by roughly the end of the fourth century) with those of all the expressions of Christianity in existence today, it becomes clear that only the Orthodox Church – through her direct, generation-by-generation, ongoing connection with the original Christian Church – has kept pure and intact, through twenty centuries, and in many different cultures, the fullness of the Truth of His Gospel, by the great love and grace of our Lord, and in direct fulfillment of His own promises.”

I would love to discuss any of these things further with you, Bob, if you’d like!

Yours, in Christ,

David Ford

2 replies
  1. Harold Heie
    Harold Heie says:

    June 18, 2022

    Thank you, David, for your thoughtful comments. I especially appreciated you including your handout; it was extremely informative. And now, let me address some of your comments/questions:

    To be sure, there are occasionally slight and often gaping differences between the various Christian communities, in terms of their theology, their practice (daily walk and talk), and how they perceive or misperceive what other denominations believe. In 1842, Joseph Smith was contacted by John Wentworth, the editor of the Chicago Democrat. Wentworth had a friend named George Barstow, who was writing a history of New Hampshire and needed more information on the Latter-day Saints, who were at that time gathered in Nauvoo, Illinois. Joseph’s response to Wentworth resulted in a brief history of the Saints that has become known as the Wentworth Letter. Notice the opening lines of that history:

    “When about fourteen years of age, I began to reflect upon the importance of being prepared for a future state, and upon enquiring about the plan of salvation, I found that there was a great clash in religious sentiment; if I went to one society, they referred me to one plan, and another to another, each one pointing to his own particular creed as the summum bonum of perfection. Considering that all could not be right, and that God could not be the author of so much confusion, I determined to investigate the subject more fully, believing that if God had a church it would not be split up into factions, and that if he taught one society to worship one way, and administer in one set of ordinances, he would not teach another principles which were diametrically opposed.
    “Believing the word of God, I had confidence in the declaration of James: “If any man lack wisdom, let him ask of God, who giveth to all men liberally and upbraideth not, and it shall be given him.” I retired to a secret place in a grove and began to call upon the Lord.”
    Well, that’s how The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints got started. Such divisions are no doubt magnified many times in our own day, and surely the Lord Jesus Christ, who prayed most earnestly in John 17 for His followers to be one, must grieve.
    Latter-day Saints base our belief in a falling away of the first-century Christian Church (thus requiring a restoration, more than a reformation) on our interpretation of Biblical passages like the following: Paul’s warning of “grievous wolves” from within the body of Christ (Acts 20:28-30); his warnings to Timothy of doctrinal drift (1 Timothy 4:1-2); Peter’s predictions of false teachers and inner strife (2 Peter 2:1-3); John the Beloved’s report of apostasy and anti-Christs within his own day (1 John 2:18-19; 4:1-3; 2 John 5).
    And, of course, we are not the only people who perceived the effects of a falling away. One of the principal voices of the Great Awakening, Jonathan Edwards, once observed that “the apostles, in their days, foretold a grand apostasy of the Christian world, which should continue many ages, and observed that there appeared a disposition to such an apostasy, among professing Christians even at that day. And the greater part of the ages which have now elapsed, have been spent in the duration of that grand and general apostasy, under which the Christian world, as it has been called, has been transformed into that which has been vastly more deformed, more dishonorable and hateful to God.” (The Great Christian Doctrine of Original Sin, 1757, 357.)

    As you know, Latter-day Saints are one of several Restorationist or Christian Primitivist movements of the early 19th century. One of the major voices of that time was Alexander Campbell, the founder of the Disciples of Christ. Campbell’s dissatisfaction with nominal Christianity is apparent in a statement from the first volume of a magazine he began called the Christian Baptist: “We are convinced, fully convinced, that the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint of modern fashionable Christianity.”

    We believe The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the restoration of the first century Christian Church. Now that’s a bold position to take for a church of only 17 million people, but in doing so we don’t in any way deny that truth and goodness and God-inspired church leaders and spiritual experiences are to be found in Christian and non-Christian denominations everywhere. In other words, we believe that God is working through noble women and men throughout the earth. Because of that, we strive to work together with people of faith, especially with those who have some of the same moral and family values that we hold so dear. We are also cognizant of our need to contend (graciously) for the continuation/recovery of religious liberties.

    Blessings to you and yours.

    Bob

    Reply
  2. David Ford
    David Ford says:

    Dear Bob,

    Thank you very much for your reply to my response to your contribution to the Respectful Conversation. Again, please forgive my slowness in responding.

    The Orthodox would interpret the NT passages you referenced, about dangers to the Church from false teachers, as being warnings for the Church to watch out for and beware of – and NOT as predictions that the entire Body of Christ would fall away into error. For as I said in my hand-out, that would be, and always will be, impossible according to our Lord’s promises in Matt.16:18 and John 16:13.

    So I guess my central question to you would be, how do the Latter Day Saints Church interpret those promises of Christ about His own Body, the Church?

    Respectfully,

    David

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.